Bhagavad Gita: Krishna Answers Arjuna On Brahman, Atman, Karma

Posted by

On September 24, 2025

Setting: Arjuna’s Question on the Battlefield

In the Bhagavad Gītā, the warrior Arjuna asks a cluster of urgent questions while standing on the battlefield of Kurukṣetra. His dilemma is practical and existential: should he fight his kin, what is his duty, what is the nature of the self, and how do action and its fruits bind or liberate a person? These questions prompt Krishna’s long reply, which we now read as a compact teaching on Brahman — ultimate reality, ātman — the individual Self, and karma — action and its consequences.

What Arjuna Asks (briefly)

Is killing one’s relatives right or wrong when duty calls? (the ethical dilemma)
What is the true nature of the self — mortal body or something beyond? (metaphysics)
How should one act without becoming bound by rewards and punishments? (practical soteriology)
Which path leads to lasting peace — knowledge, action, or devotion? (soteriological choice)

Krishna’s Core Responses — Brahman, Atman, Karma

Krishna answers across many chapters, giving layered teachings rather than a single sentence answer. Key points include:

Immortality of the Self: The Gītā teaches the ātman is not the body but an enduring principle. Famous verses in chapter 2 explain that the soul does not die with the body (Gīta 2.20 and surrounding verses).
Distinction and relationship — Brahman and Ātman: Krishna describes an ultimate reality that pervades and transcends nature. In Gītā 13 the text distinguishes the “field” (kṣetra) and the knower of the field (kṣetrajña), a way of pointing to both the manifest world and the abiding consciousness. Different schools read the relation between Brahman and Ātman in different ways (see below).
Karma and detached action: Practical teaching centers on acting according to one’s duty (dharma) without attachment to outcomes — the principle often summed up by Gītā 2.47: act, but give up craving for the fruit. This is the heart of karma-yoga (chapter 3).
Paths combined: Krishna does not exclude knowledge (jñāna), devotion (bhakti), or disciplined practice. The Gītā presents an integrated view in which right action, insight, and loving surrender can together lead to liberation (especially chapters 12 and 18).

Key scriptural touchpoints

Gītā 2.11–30: nature of the Self and the argument against despair.
Gītā 2.47: the famous counsel on acting without attachment to results.
Gītā 3: argument for action performed as duty but without binding desire.
Gītā 12 and 18: the place of devotion and the synthesis of paths.
Gītā 13: discussion of the field and the knower of the field (metaphysical taxonomy).

How Different Traditions Read Arjuna’s Question

Commentators and schools offer varied but respectful readings.

Advaita Vedānta (e.g., Śaṅkara): Emphasises non-dual identity: ultimately ātman is identical with Brahman; knowledge (jñāna) that removes ignorance is decisive. Śaṅkara reads the Gītā as a text that uses action and devotion as preparatory disciplines leading to liberating knowledge.
Viśiṣṭādvaita (Ramanuja): Stresses qualified non-dualism: the soul is distinct yet inseparable from a personal Brahman. Devotional surrender and service are central; liberation is communion rather than strict identity.
Dvaita (Madhva): Emphasises eternal difference between individual souls and God; devotion and God’s grace are necessary.
Bhakti traditions (Vaiṣṇava, Śaiva, Śākta): Often prioritise loving surrender to a personal deity. Arjuna’s question becomes an invitation to trust divine will and perform one’s duty with devotion.
Sāṃkhya and Yoga readings: Sāṃkhya influence is visible in Gītā’s analystical distinction between puruṣa (consciousness) and prakṛti (nature); Yoga practices are offered as disciplined means to steady the mind.

Practical Implications for Life and Practice

Arjuna’s dilemma translates into living advice that communities have applied for millennia:

Perform duty according to social and ethical role (dharma), but cultivate non-attachment to outcomes.
Combine paths: study and reflection (jñāna), disciplined practice (yoga), selfless service (karma), and devotion (bhakti) are not mutually exclusive.
Ethics and ritual retain importance: temple worship, festivals, vrata and seva structure devotion and community; scriptural study and guidance from a teacher (guru) help prevent literal or harmful readings of texts.

Note: Some practices discussed in classical texts — fasting, prolonged breath-control, austere tapas — can affect health. If you consider such disciplines, consult a qualified teacher and health professional.

Short FAQ

Is ātman the same as Brahman? Different schools answer differently. Advaita says “yes” in the highest sense; other schools qualify or reject strict identity. The Gītā allows for multiple levels of description.
Does karma mean fatalism? No. Traditional Indian thought generally holds that past actions influence circumstances, but present choices, intention, and ethical effort shape future outcomes. The Gītā’s emphasis is on right action now, not resignation.
Which path should I choose? The Gītā’s practical answer is: follow the path suited to your temperament and duty, while cultivating wisdom and surrender. Many living traditions combine paths rather than insisting on exclusive methods.

Conclusion

Arjuna’s questions about Brahman, karma, and the self are both context-specific and timeless. The Bhagavad Gītā offers an integrated set of teachings: an ontological claim about the abiding Self, a moral counsel for action without attachment, and a plural set of paths leading toward freedom. How one reads and lives these teachings varies across Vedāntin, Bhakti, and tantric streams — and across families and gurus — but the central practical invitation remains: act rightly, know truly, and cultivate a mind freed from greedy attachment. In living traditions across India, this conversation continues in scriptural study, temple practice, service, and meditation, always with acknowledgement of interpretive diversity and the guidance of teachers.